Attorney for woman in Greitens' affair: Time for governor to 'ta - KCTV5 News

Attorney for woman in Greitens' affair: Time for governor to 'take responsibility'

Posted: Updated:
Attorneys defending Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens against an invasion-of-privacy charge are raising doubts about the testimony of a woman with whom he had an affair. (AP) Attorneys defending Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens against an invasion-of-privacy charge are raising doubts about the testimony of a woman with whom he had an affair. (AP)
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -

Attorneys defending Missouri Gov. Eric Greitens against a felony invasion-of-privacy charge have raised new doubts about a key allegation that he took a nonconsensual photo of a partially nude woman with whom he had an affair.

In a court filing dated Sunday, Greitens' attorneys say the woman testified during a Friday deposition that she never saw Greitens with a camera or phone on the day he is accused of taking a partially nude photo of her while she was blindfolded and her hands bound.

The court filing says the woman also testified that she doesn't know if her belief that he had a phone was the result of a dream.

Scott Simpson, the attorney for the woman, issued a statement on Monday evening: 

"Navy Seals have a code that directs its members to take responsibility for their actions and the actions of their teammates. With that code in mind, it is time for Gov. Eric Greitens to take responsibility for his actions as well as the actions of his team which is made up of the best lawyers other people's money can buy. Gov. Greitens has admitted to my client, on multiple occasions, that he took her photograph, without her consent, and threatened to release it if she ever told anyone about their relationship. Instead of taking responsibility for his actions, Gov. Greitens had decided to let his team attack my client by mis-characterizing her deposition testimony. 

"In an effort to preserve her privacy and the privacy of her children, my client has refused to comment on this case and her silence has allowed a number of false and misleading statements to go unanswered. However, the most recent attack on my client's credibility cannot be ignored; it is time to set the record straight. We will support a motion to release the complete transcript of my client's deposition, so long as her name and other identifying information is redacted. Gov. Greitens needs to take responsibility for his actions and be honest about the fact that he took my client's photograph without her consent. 

"The governor can continue to try this case in the media, but at his trial, the facts will speak for themselves. My client has taken responsibility for her actions and it is time Gov. Greitens accepts responsibility for his." 

A spokeswoman for St. Louis Circuit attorney Kim Gardner said Monday that Greitens' attorneys had "cherry picked bits and pieces" of the woman's nine-hour deposition "to attack her credibility."

The filing is labeled as a motion to compel St. Louis city prosecutors to turn over any previously undisclosed testimony or evidence that may be beneficial to Greitens' criminal defense.

Gardner spokeswoman Susan Ryan called the motion "frivolous" and said prosecutors have complied with all evidence-sharing rules.

The latest court filing comes as Greitens' defense team has been urging a special Missouri House committee to delay its own investigatory report — planned to be released this week — until after Greitens' trial in May.

Greitens acknowledged in January that he had an extramarital affair in 2015 as he was preparing to run for governor. That came as St. Louis television station KMOV aired a report in which the woman describes a March 21, 2015, encounter with Greitens during a conversation that her husband secretly recorded.

In that recorded conversation, the woman says Greitens invited her into the basement of his St. Louis home, where he tied her hands to some exercise rings, blindfolded her and partially undid her clothing. She said she saw a flash through the blindfold and Greitens said to her, "You're never going to mention my name, otherwise there will be pictures of me everywhere." The woman said Greitens told her later in the day that he had erased the photo.

Greitens has denied blackmailing the woman but has not directly answered questions about whether he took a photo.

A St. Louis grand jury indicted Greitens in February for allegedly taking the photo and transmitting it in a way that it could be accessed by a computer.

Prosecutors previously acknowledged that they don't have the photo. But they could be trying to obtain it. If the photo were taken using a smartphone, it may have been automatically transmitted to cloud-based storage and the government could subpoena a technology company for access to it.

The court filing by Greitens' attorneys said the woman participated in a lengthy deposition Friday. After acknowledging she hadn't seen a camera or phone, she was asked if she saw what she believed to be a phone.

"I haven't talked about it because I don't know if it's because I'm remembering it through a dream or I — I'm not sure, but yes, I feel like I saw it after that happened," she responded, according to the court filing.

Ryan said, "There is nothing substantially new about the victim's testimony in the deposition." She said Greitens' defense team is "playing political games" and attempting "to try this case in the media."

The court filing says the woman also acknowledged that she sent partially nude images of herself to Greitens in June 2015 and had willingly continued to see him for months after the March 2015 encounter. Greitens' attorneys said that was an indication she didn't feel like her privacy had been violated.

A phone message for the woman's attorney was not immediately returned Monday.

A source gave KCTV5 News the following court documents Monday:

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press.

Powered by Frankly
KCTV 5 News

Online Public File:
KCTV  KSMO

Powered by WorldNow CNN
All content © 2018, KCTV; Kansas City, MO. (A Meredith Corporation Station) . All Rights Reserved.
For more information on this site, please read our Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service, and Ad Choices.